Holt’s Fourth Porus Chariot-Type Medallion: A Point-by-Point Rebuttal / Czwarty „medallion Porusa z rydwanem” Holta. Odpowiedź punkt po punkcie (PDF, 1,5 MB)
Andrew M. Chugg, Independent Researcher
Elena Varotto, Flinders University of South Australia
ORCID: 0000-0001-6637-9402
Michael E. Habicht, Flinders University of South Australia
ORCID: 0000-0002-0193-9672
Francesco M. Galassi, University of Łódź
ORCID: 0000-0001-8902-3142
Holt’s Fourth Porus Chariot-Type Medallion: A Point-by-Point Rebuttal
Abstract: In this article the authors of an original publication on the so‑called Porus medallions of Alexander the Great published a few years ago in the Journal of the Numismatic Association of Australia respond to some criticism addressed at their study by F. Holt in issue 15 of this journal (pp. 13–20). The authors’ rebuttal is based on mathematical principles and textual analysis.
Key words: Alexander the Great, numismatics, Porus medallion, probability, ancient sources
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52800/ajst.1.17.p1
Andrew M. Chugg, A.M., Varotto, E., Habicht, M.E. and Galassi, F.M. 2022. “Holt’s Fourth Porus Chariot-Type Medallion: A Point-by-Point Rebuttal”, Notae Numismaticae – Zapiski Numizmatyczne 17: 261–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52800/ajst.1.17.p1